31.) Because lets be clear, the outside forces mattered in 2016. The coverage of this race was awful.— Rich Wilkins (@TheRichWilkins) December 1, 2016
32.) First, our media. They gave him free coverage that allowed him to skip paid ads other candidates have to use. It was an in-kind ad.— Rich Wilkins (@TheRichWilkins) December 1, 2016
33.) Rallies were shown in full, Morning Joe gave him his own damn segment.... it was utterly unfair to all other candidates.— Rich Wilkins (@TheRichWilkins) December 1, 2016
34.) I get it though, a Trump infomercial was good for ratings, so I can't fault the management here.— Rich Wilkins (@TheRichWilkins) December 1, 2016
35.) I will fault reporters though- their pledge of neutrality made them cover Trump like any other candidate- and he wasn't.— Rich Wilkins (@TheRichWilkins) December 1, 2016
36.) Even as he created a dangerous, negative atmosphere, even calling reporters out, they stayed "fair" in covering him.— Rich Wilkins (@TheRichWilkins) December 1, 2016
37.) And of course, they treated Hillary with "neutral" coverage too. Particularly when it came to bogus "scandals" involving her.— Rich Wilkins (@TheRichWilkins) December 1, 2016
38.) The very fact they covered Donald's attacks on the Clinton Foundation show that they will cover anything either party says.— Rich Wilkins (@TheRichWilkins) December 1, 2016
39.) Their coverage of the emails- that there was a scandal- was really the worst though. This was never a real threat to our nation.— Rich Wilkins (@TheRichWilkins) December 1, 2016
40.) The proof? Coney didn't charge, AND Trump isn't pushing the issue after the election. They were had.— Rich Wilkins (@TheRichWilkins) December 1, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment