Today, 53 years ago, President John F. Kennedy was killed in Dallas, TX. His murder remains a subject of great debate, with conspiracy theories of all types rising from the events of that day. If you ask people of that generation, they can all tell you where they were that day.
Jack Kennedy has served as a ghost to chase for Democrats for over a generation. He was inspirational, and aspirational. He called for a nation to reach for the Moon, but also to right it's wrongs in regards to Civil Rights. He asked what we could do for the country, and created the Peace Corps to give an opportunity to do it. He was absolutely a mixed bag- he screwed up royally on the Bay of Pigs, but showed resolve in the Cuban Missile Crisis; He didn't achieve his Civil Rights aspirations, but he certainly was a catalyst in making things happen; He did put more advisors in Vietnam, but he also clearly wasn't willing to go fully into the Southeast Asian war. JFK was complicated, and yet he is the inspirational light that unites a lot of Americans in their hopes for our politics.
I personally draw more inspiration from JFK's brother Bobby than from him, but that is not because I don't see the appeal of JFK and his short Presidency. I was born 20 years after John F. Kennedy's assassination, and it has always been part of the history books for me. Even so, it's important today to remember him, and what he stands for to many others. RIP JFK, the nation could use just about any leader of your capability at this time.
Tuesday, November 22, 2016
Lessons From Election 2016
The 2016 Election is over, thank God. With the election now two weeks in the past, we can begin to take a look back, and see what actually happened. What are some things that we can learn from this election:
- Candidates matter. I must admit, I had begun to buy into the idea that candidates didn't matter much. In an era of demographics telling us more about a voter than anything else, we found out that voters are still people, and computers don't make the votes for us. Hillary Clinton's extremely high negatives among the electorate were a disqualifier, even among some Democrats.
- The Polling Actually Wasn't Bad. So, all we've heard since election night was how bad the polling was, how we got "Brexit'ed." We didn't. Hillary Clinton lead in the final RCP average by 3.3% in the polls. Her current popular vote lead is a little shy of two-million votes, and she will probably end up with 2-2.5 million votes in her popular vote margin, or roughly a 2% win. Remember, her 3.3% lead was in national polling, not in state polling, and her victory of 2% nationally is right in line with that, comfortably within margin of error. If you look at the state polling, it showed a very tight race in many of the swing states, and that was backed up by the results. Trump could add up his margin of victory in Florida, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Ohio, and not have near two million votes to spare. Again though, they are swing states, they are closer by nature, and the polling showed that would be the result.
- Demographics aren't the destiny that Democrats thought. Well, Hillary Clinton got waxed among white voters, perhaps even worse than expected. The other dirty little truth is that President Obama's vote share among Latinos and African-Americans was not sustained by Hillary Clinton, despite every effort to do so. Donald Trump improved the Republicans' share among both of those groups, and that was a huge part of why he won.
- Republicans have won the popular vote once since the Cold War. This is kind of amazing, and not really debatable. From the 1992 Election forward, the GOP has won the popular vote exactly once, 2004. This obviously begs many other questions, but the reality here is that California and New York are really disenfranchised by this system.
- Voters don't care about issues and plans. Hillary Clinton put out plans and issue papers all the time. Donald Trump just told us his plans "would be great." It didn't matter a bit. Voters don't understand policy, and they don't care about it. Voters vote thematically, and we'd be smart to learn that.
- Donald Trump did drown out his negative coverage. Donald Trump figured something out- more noise is good. He would drown out one scandal with another, he'd start a new fight when he was in danger, and eventually the public couldn't follow any more. The man is a brilliant marketer.
- Our media is broken. E-Mails. No, really, e-mails. We heard a year and a half of e-mail talk, which amounted to what? Not even a charge against Hillary Clinton. We heard "questions" about the Clinton Foundation, a highly rated non-profit by the watchdogs too. Any charges there? No. Meanwhile, Donald Trump actually was working with the Kremlin, actually won't step down as the head of his company, actually had to settle his fraud case from Trump University, and actually has a foundation that is under investigation. "Balance" has drowned out truth in our media.
- You don't get to pick your swing states. Remember how Georgia was the new battleground? Yeah, me too. I also remember Hillary not visiting Wisconsin in the final week. Yes, Democrats usually win Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, but taking them for granted is stupid. I bet the 2020 nominee won't skip out on visiting them lots. The truth is that while there's much to malign about white working-class voters, they are still people, with votes, and insulting them is not a strategy that will win the White House.
- Both sides will learn the wrong lessons from this. Go the Bernie route? No thanks, Democrats. Trump won because he didn't have a ground game? Yeah, not quite. When Democrats won in 2012, they wrote the post-mortem in the way they wanted, not the way it actually went. The truth is that President Obama's tough attacks on Mitt Romney's business record and taxes prevented the working class voters from falling in love with him like they did Trump, and kept many of them with President Obama. The way the story was written, it was every other group of voters that drove him to victory. I'm going to bet that the GOP will convince themselves of the story they want out of 2016, not the one that happened.
- No, Bernie wouldn't have "absolutely" won. Ok, Bernie Sanders did win white working-class voters in the primary. Does that mean he would have pulled more of those voters away from Trump in the general election? Not much more. If he had done that, there's still the issue of minority turnout, which dropped in 2016, and within which Trump made progress. Bernie lost those voters in the primary by wide margins. There's no reason to believe he would have held onto these votes, even as well as Hillary did. Beyond all of that, Bernie was not hit very hard in the primaries, and he would have been hit quite hard by Donald Trump. That would have changed things, a lot.
Monday, November 21, 2016
Ranking My Favorite Bars, Crappy Politics and All
My favorite beer is Yuengling and my favorite bar in Washington is Russia House. Bad combo for a Democrat, right? I mean, honestly, it doesn't bode well for you when you know that your favorite beer hates unions and Democrats, and when the owner actually put his money behind our second-place President. It almost makes me want to boycott, even though I generally don't believe in boycotts over politics (unless the situation is very serious). I'll definitely give Russia House a pass though- just being Russian isn't bad.
It's about the time of year where I should do my annual favorite bar's list. It's not scientific, and it's frankly not even claiming to be all-inclusive- I do most of my drinking here in Easton. Even so, I have a list in mind, and I'm going to run with it. Here is my top five.
It's about the time of year where I should do my annual favorite bar's list. It's not scientific, and it's frankly not even claiming to be all-inclusive- I do most of my drinking here in Easton. Even so, I have a list in mind, and I'm going to run with it. Here is my top five.
- College Hill Tavern- Easton, PA- So this is practically my home bar. Located a couple of blocks from Lafayette College, and a short ride from my house, it's convenient. It's not the dive it used to be, but the trade off is that the food is really good now. Of course the bar where the bartenders know my name and what i'm ordering when I walk in is going to be #1.
- Russia House- Washington, DC- Ok, it's pricey. Past that, it's awesome. I had a Ukrainian lager last week, and it was really awesome. The bartenders are legitimately from the old Soviet bloc, and the food is good- but expensive. Obviously, they have an incredible array of vodkas to drink.
- OBT- Bethlehem, PA- This place has changed owners many times, but who doesn't love the dive bar by their college? It's hard to not love the OBT now, with it's nice outside patio in the Summer, and spacious inside, complete with Beirut (Beer Pong) tables. I do miss the days of $2 pitchers (when I was in college), or when the exterior of the bar wasn't finished, to save tax money.
- Cafe 210 West- State College, PA- Any bar located on College Avenue in State College is going to be awesome. This one is just my personal favorite. I love the patio, and the beer is pretty cheap. I've only ever been there on game weekends, so it's particularly awesome, and crowded. I like crowded if i'm going out to drink.
- Bob and Barbara's- Philadelphia, PA- There are two basic reasons this is on the list. The first is that you can find a "regular" crowd there during weekdays, in my experience, which is how you know a bar is awesome. The second reason is "the special." The shots of Jameson and PBR pounders come in threes, and they were $9. Simply put, for a place on South Street in Philadelphia to be that cheap means it's a place I need to go.
My Grandfather, the Last Time a Republican Promised Better Days Ahead, and Blue-Collar Workers
I visited my grandmother on Friday for the first time in over a month, and since the election. As I was eating a sandwich and talking to her, she said she wanted me to read something she wrote, and then she proceeded to read it to me. It was a letter about my grandfather, voting, and the impact on his life. At first I found it a bit odd, but then I found it to make perfect sense in light of the results of this election.
My grandfather was a registered independent at the end of his life, a Navy veteran, and chaired his township's planning commission, serving on the body for over 40 years. He almost always voted Democratic though, having grown up in an immigrant household where everyone backed the party of FDR and JFK. The only exception in his Democratic votes for President prior to 1980 were his votes for President Eisenhower in 1952 and 1956. As 1980 approached though, things weren't quite going as well for him at work. The boss' kids were now running the business, and many of the benefits were starting to go away. Ronald Reagan promised to bring back American greatness, and to end the sense of a downward spiral in the country. My grandfather liked what he heard. By 1982 though, he was dealing with part-time layoffs, a bleaker future, and tougher times. By 1984, he was anti-Reagan. He felt mislead.
I don't write this to compare Trump to Reagan, but I think there is some level to which the two share common messaging. America did really well from early 1950's until the late 1970's, and the quality of life for working class men was pretty darn good. Unions had secured them raises, benefits, and retirements that allowed them to raise a family in suburbia, and have a sense of pride. That started to die in the 1970's, and the death of it accelerated in the 1980's. The 1990's were a nice decade, but it was more of a pause in the downward spiral than a break. Reagan, at the start of the decline of the working class man, promised that his administration would relieve them of their crushing tax burden, and would give them room to prosper. Trump now promises an even more vague sense of greatness, in which he's going to bring back coal mines and factories, cut taxes to the bone, and somehow balance the budget. It is nothing short of magic, but magic sounds better than reality, especially when the alternative is a pride-less existence, where the good paying jobs are gone, but all the struggles are here to stay.
I am by no means discounting the influence of racism and sexism on the Trump victory- you simply can't divorce them from the outcome. You cannot pretend that they did not contribute to the result, but you can't exclusively blame them either. Here's the simple truth- while the Democratic Party has talked a lot about the plight of a lot of people who absolutely need a government that works for them, the Democratic Party has largely white-washed out any agenda that seems to address blue-collar white guys. Yes, part of that is these voters not voting for us. Part of that is also a push towards identity politics that seem to cast these folks as "privileged," even while they feel forgotten. Are they ignorant on a lot of matters? Yes, they are. They are still people and voters though, and it's hard to see them voting for a party that talked a lot less about apprenticeships and re-training people in the trades, and a lot more about social issues that speak largely to a more affluent voter in the cities and on the coasts.
Reagans' 1980s were not kind to my grandfather's hometown of Phillipsburg, an industrial place that saw many of it's top employers leave. His old workplace, Keystone Packaging, looks largely closed at this point, and definitely isn't employing a bunch of blue-collar workers today. Reagan did leave office fairly well-liked though, in no small part because he spoke directly to these blue-collar workers and convinced them that he could solve their problems. Donald Trump has gone a step further, blaming the "others" for their problems, and saying that he alone can solve these issues. Democrats would be wise to not discount the power in that message moving forward.
My guess is that Donald Trump will actually try to govern more in the tradition of pre-JFK Democrats than actually as a full-blown Reagan, or worse yet, a Hitler. He will infuse populist economics in his message, while sprinkling in some racism, sexism, and classism that his base craves. That is how he ran, and it worked well for him. He'll scapegoat groups, while sometimes not acting on his wild-eyed promises, and use that to cover up the simple truth of the matter here- Donald Trump isn't bringing back those factories, he's not bringing back those coal mines, and he's not ending global trade. Nobody is. If he actually succeeded, we'd have a Depression economically, and we'd go backwards a century. For that reason, I doubt he'll actually succeed in enacting his campaign promises, but he'll keep that rhetoric up to mask the fact that he is actually governing like any mainstream Republican of the last quarter-century would- tax cuts for the wealthy, de-regulation for corporations, and some hand-outs for supportive groups of the party. Donald Trump won't actually be a change agent at all, he'll just be a fraud that manages to enrage people on all political sides.
My grandfather was a working class boy from Phillipsburg, who served his country, and then was able to move out to the township and have a decent life. He, like many blue-collar men of today, fell for a man who promised to make American life great again, if we'd just follow him. It took him a lot less time than most to realize he had been had. Unfortunately, it's happened again in America. We can only hope this time that people come to their senses quicker.
My grandfather was a registered independent at the end of his life, a Navy veteran, and chaired his township's planning commission, serving on the body for over 40 years. He almost always voted Democratic though, having grown up in an immigrant household where everyone backed the party of FDR and JFK. The only exception in his Democratic votes for President prior to 1980 were his votes for President Eisenhower in 1952 and 1956. As 1980 approached though, things weren't quite going as well for him at work. The boss' kids were now running the business, and many of the benefits were starting to go away. Ronald Reagan promised to bring back American greatness, and to end the sense of a downward spiral in the country. My grandfather liked what he heard. By 1982 though, he was dealing with part-time layoffs, a bleaker future, and tougher times. By 1984, he was anti-Reagan. He felt mislead.
I don't write this to compare Trump to Reagan, but I think there is some level to which the two share common messaging. America did really well from early 1950's until the late 1970's, and the quality of life for working class men was pretty darn good. Unions had secured them raises, benefits, and retirements that allowed them to raise a family in suburbia, and have a sense of pride. That started to die in the 1970's, and the death of it accelerated in the 1980's. The 1990's were a nice decade, but it was more of a pause in the downward spiral than a break. Reagan, at the start of the decline of the working class man, promised that his administration would relieve them of their crushing tax burden, and would give them room to prosper. Trump now promises an even more vague sense of greatness, in which he's going to bring back coal mines and factories, cut taxes to the bone, and somehow balance the budget. It is nothing short of magic, but magic sounds better than reality, especially when the alternative is a pride-less existence, where the good paying jobs are gone, but all the struggles are here to stay.
I am by no means discounting the influence of racism and sexism on the Trump victory- you simply can't divorce them from the outcome. You cannot pretend that they did not contribute to the result, but you can't exclusively blame them either. Here's the simple truth- while the Democratic Party has talked a lot about the plight of a lot of people who absolutely need a government that works for them, the Democratic Party has largely white-washed out any agenda that seems to address blue-collar white guys. Yes, part of that is these voters not voting for us. Part of that is also a push towards identity politics that seem to cast these folks as "privileged," even while they feel forgotten. Are they ignorant on a lot of matters? Yes, they are. They are still people and voters though, and it's hard to see them voting for a party that talked a lot less about apprenticeships and re-training people in the trades, and a lot more about social issues that speak largely to a more affluent voter in the cities and on the coasts.
Reagans' 1980s were not kind to my grandfather's hometown of Phillipsburg, an industrial place that saw many of it's top employers leave. His old workplace, Keystone Packaging, looks largely closed at this point, and definitely isn't employing a bunch of blue-collar workers today. Reagan did leave office fairly well-liked though, in no small part because he spoke directly to these blue-collar workers and convinced them that he could solve their problems. Donald Trump has gone a step further, blaming the "others" for their problems, and saying that he alone can solve these issues. Democrats would be wise to not discount the power in that message moving forward.
My guess is that Donald Trump will actually try to govern more in the tradition of pre-JFK Democrats than actually as a full-blown Reagan, or worse yet, a Hitler. He will infuse populist economics in his message, while sprinkling in some racism, sexism, and classism that his base craves. That is how he ran, and it worked well for him. He'll scapegoat groups, while sometimes not acting on his wild-eyed promises, and use that to cover up the simple truth of the matter here- Donald Trump isn't bringing back those factories, he's not bringing back those coal mines, and he's not ending global trade. Nobody is. If he actually succeeded, we'd have a Depression economically, and we'd go backwards a century. For that reason, I doubt he'll actually succeed in enacting his campaign promises, but he'll keep that rhetoric up to mask the fact that he is actually governing like any mainstream Republican of the last quarter-century would- tax cuts for the wealthy, de-regulation for corporations, and some hand-outs for supportive groups of the party. Donald Trump won't actually be a change agent at all, he'll just be a fraud that manages to enrage people on all political sides.
My grandfather was a working class boy from Phillipsburg, who served his country, and then was able to move out to the township and have a decent life. He, like many blue-collar men of today, fell for a man who promised to make American life great again, if we'd just follow him. It took him a lot less time than most to realize he had been had. Unfortunately, it's happened again in America. We can only hope this time that people come to their senses quicker.
Haves and Have Nots- College Sports Edition
Saturday night had to be pretty tough for Rutgers fans and alums. They lost 39-0, and remain winless on the season in the Big Ten. They got humiliated by the team they desperately want to call their rival. They did so on senior night, at home. They did so in terrible weather. They did so in front of a crowd that could charitably been measured in dozens at the end, rather than thousands. It was probably the most humiliating situation I've ever seen.
In case you haven't looked lately, Penn State, Michigan, Ohio State, Nebraska, and Wisconsin are the teams battling to win the Big Ten. Oklahoma is the front-runner in the Big 12. Clemson controls it's fate in the ACC. Alabama will play Florida in the SEC Championship game. Washington and Colorado are trying to hold off USC in the PAC 12. In other words, if you haven't watched a game all season, and you just started watching college football this week, you could have guessed nearly all of the contenders for the national championship. If you want to call Washington and Colorado surprises, go ahead, but they are both schools that have been very good in the past.
This is not just a football thing either in the NCAA. Duke started the men's basketball season #1, with Kansas, Kentucky, and UNC all in the top ten, as usual. Penn State's wrestling team will be heavy favorites to win another championship, with Ohio State, Iowa, and Oklahoma State giving their normally strong chase. The UCONN women's basketball team will be favored to win the championship again. I could go on, but the point is made.
College sports mirror the marketplace in America- "the haves" keep having, the "have nots" don't. If you simply guessed the regular powerhouses are good again this year, they probably are. There's not much suspense to it. In fact, there's not as much suspense as there are in professional sports, where CBAs and free agency keep teams from building dynasties. While people love the unpredictability of pro sports, they don't seem to mind the predictability of the NCAA. If I knew why that is, I'd tell you, but i'm clueless there. Very clearly though, no one will be complaining this weekend when they watch Alabama and Auburn battle in the Iron Bowl, or when they watch Michigan-Ohio State. I guess some people will be complaining though- in New Brunswick, NJ.
In case you haven't looked lately, Penn State, Michigan, Ohio State, Nebraska, and Wisconsin are the teams battling to win the Big Ten. Oklahoma is the front-runner in the Big 12. Clemson controls it's fate in the ACC. Alabama will play Florida in the SEC Championship game. Washington and Colorado are trying to hold off USC in the PAC 12. In other words, if you haven't watched a game all season, and you just started watching college football this week, you could have guessed nearly all of the contenders for the national championship. If you want to call Washington and Colorado surprises, go ahead, but they are both schools that have been very good in the past.
This is not just a football thing either in the NCAA. Duke started the men's basketball season #1, with Kansas, Kentucky, and UNC all in the top ten, as usual. Penn State's wrestling team will be heavy favorites to win another championship, with Ohio State, Iowa, and Oklahoma State giving their normally strong chase. The UCONN women's basketball team will be favored to win the championship again. I could go on, but the point is made.
College sports mirror the marketplace in America- "the haves" keep having, the "have nots" don't. If you simply guessed the regular powerhouses are good again this year, they probably are. There's not much suspense to it. In fact, there's not as much suspense as there are in professional sports, where CBAs and free agency keep teams from building dynasties. While people love the unpredictability of pro sports, they don't seem to mind the predictability of the NCAA. If I knew why that is, I'd tell you, but i'm clueless there. Very clearly though, no one will be complaining this weekend when they watch Alabama and Auburn battle in the Iron Bowl, or when they watch Michigan-Ohio State. I guess some people will be complaining though- in New Brunswick, NJ.
Sunday, November 20, 2016
The Rise of November Activism is Troubling Me
November 8th was the election. If you didn't know any better though, you might have thought it was still going on by the 9th. People took to the streets in mass. Talk of a "liberal Tea Party" began emerging from the dust. People spray painted obscene phrases (like the one above) on buildings. Internet groups, especially on Facebook, emerged.
Where was this on the 7th?
I get it, not everyone loved Hillary Clinton, so the story goes that they weren't inspired during the race. Clearly the hate for Donald Trump is real though. If you actually believe he's a fascist, if you actually believe he's a racist, if you actually believe he's a criminal, shouldn't you have worked harder to stop that? Shouldn't you have volunteered for the Democrats and the Clinton campaign, and given your all to stop him? Certainly, if you believe such terrible things about Trump, shouldn't you have not voted for Johnson or Stein?
Donald Trump very well may do terrible harm to Latinos, the LGBT community, African-Americans, the young, and even the old. I don't disagree that he may take away the health care of over twenty million people, and that's not even considering that he may end Medicare. I agree that Donald Trump is a horrible, horrible problem that may hurt America- a lot.
I reject the idea that you can divorce yourself of politics and actually care about politics though. Elections have consequences, and failure to take part in an election, to really engage beyond voting, is an impeachable offense to me. Was Hillary Clinton someone who inspired like President Obama or her husband? Absolutely not. Was she as firey as Bernie, or as likable as Joe Biden? No. She was competent though, and almost all of those in the streets would agree that she didn't have designs on deporting millions, banning religions from immigrating here, or taking away anyone's rights in America. They just weren't inspired by her. Well, sometimes we have to take our inspiration from things besides a charismatic candidate. If you really think that Donald Trump is a danger to the republic, but you aren't willing to give your energy to beating him before he gets elected, what does that say about you?
A lot of the people protesting right now were heavily engaged in the campaign this Fall, and I'm not really talking to them here. To those who didn't though, I'm speaking pretty directly. The current crop of protests are sort of without a point. Are we all mad about the results of the election? Yes. Does it matter now? No. Donald Trump will be the 45th President. If he and the Republican Congress are capable people (which they may not be), they will act on some of his campaign themes. If you are now protesting in hopes of changing those realities, I'm sorry to bring disappointing news- but it's a waste. If you are protesting now in hopes of changing the minds of Trump supporters by yelling louder, I bring bad news- it won't work. If you're protesting just to vent, that's perfectly fine- but eventually we have to face up to the reality of not winning. The time to change all of these things was November 8th, and before that day.
Elections matter. You cannot be an activist and divorce yourself of that.
Where was this on the 7th?
I get it, not everyone loved Hillary Clinton, so the story goes that they weren't inspired during the race. Clearly the hate for Donald Trump is real though. If you actually believe he's a fascist, if you actually believe he's a racist, if you actually believe he's a criminal, shouldn't you have worked harder to stop that? Shouldn't you have volunteered for the Democrats and the Clinton campaign, and given your all to stop him? Certainly, if you believe such terrible things about Trump, shouldn't you have not voted for Johnson or Stein?
Donald Trump very well may do terrible harm to Latinos, the LGBT community, African-Americans, the young, and even the old. I don't disagree that he may take away the health care of over twenty million people, and that's not even considering that he may end Medicare. I agree that Donald Trump is a horrible, horrible problem that may hurt America- a lot.
I reject the idea that you can divorce yourself of politics and actually care about politics though. Elections have consequences, and failure to take part in an election, to really engage beyond voting, is an impeachable offense to me. Was Hillary Clinton someone who inspired like President Obama or her husband? Absolutely not. Was she as firey as Bernie, or as likable as Joe Biden? No. She was competent though, and almost all of those in the streets would agree that she didn't have designs on deporting millions, banning religions from immigrating here, or taking away anyone's rights in America. They just weren't inspired by her. Well, sometimes we have to take our inspiration from things besides a charismatic candidate. If you really think that Donald Trump is a danger to the republic, but you aren't willing to give your energy to beating him before he gets elected, what does that say about you?
A lot of the people protesting right now were heavily engaged in the campaign this Fall, and I'm not really talking to them here. To those who didn't though, I'm speaking pretty directly. The current crop of protests are sort of without a point. Are we all mad about the results of the election? Yes. Does it matter now? No. Donald Trump will be the 45th President. If he and the Republican Congress are capable people (which they may not be), they will act on some of his campaign themes. If you are now protesting in hopes of changing those realities, I'm sorry to bring disappointing news- but it's a waste. If you are protesting now in hopes of changing the minds of Trump supporters by yelling louder, I bring bad news- it won't work. If you're protesting just to vent, that's perfectly fine- but eventually we have to face up to the reality of not winning. The time to change all of these things was November 8th, and before that day.
Elections matter. You cannot be an activist and divorce yourself of that.
Labels:
2016 Election,
protests
Location:
Philadelphia, PA, USA
"The Rivalry"- My First Lehigh-Lafayette on the Hill
Lehigh University and Lafayette College played 149 games before I ever saw one, despite growing up in the Easton area. Even that 150th game though was played in New York City, at Yankee Stadium, and so even seeing that game didn't count to me as "seeing" one, to me. I've been to pre-game tailgates, particularly when I was in college and Goodman Stadium was just across town, but I had never went in- until yesterday. I went into Fisher Field and watched the 152nd game.
This game was a mismatch, and there wasn't really any drama to it. Lehigh won 45-21, and that looks a lot closer than it was. Lafayette has won three games in the past two years, and it showed yesterday. The game wasn't sold out, and Lehigh seemed to have a lot more people who traveled to this one than normally would go to the road stadium. While Lafayette did win that 150th battle, since then it's been Lehigh's game.
Fisher Field is a pretty cool place to see a game. As you can see above, it's a really nice venue, and it can be loud when the crowd wants it to be. Both Fisher and Kirby Field house have undergone some serious renovations in recent years, and the venues are just night and day better than they used to be. I've been going to the Easton-Phillipsburg Thanksgiving Day game at Fisher my whole life, and so it wasn't "special" to be there yesterday. With that said, I did take my time to admire the venue a bit.
Is Lehigh-Lafayette as big of a rivalry as they say? My takeaway from yesterday is yes, but this wasn't the year to watch it. Lafayette needs to make some moves to improve the program, and give their fans something to cheer for again. That might take a year or two. For now though, Lehigh is taking their playoff bound squad to the post-season on a high note, winning the game they really had to win this season.
This game was a mismatch, and there wasn't really any drama to it. Lehigh won 45-21, and that looks a lot closer than it was. Lafayette has won three games in the past two years, and it showed yesterday. The game wasn't sold out, and Lehigh seemed to have a lot more people who traveled to this one than normally would go to the road stadium. While Lafayette did win that 150th battle, since then it's been Lehigh's game.
Fisher Field is a pretty cool place to see a game. As you can see above, it's a really nice venue, and it can be loud when the crowd wants it to be. Both Fisher and Kirby Field house have undergone some serious renovations in recent years, and the venues are just night and day better than they used to be. I've been going to the Easton-Phillipsburg Thanksgiving Day game at Fisher my whole life, and so it wasn't "special" to be there yesterday. With that said, I did take my time to admire the venue a bit.
Is Lehigh-Lafayette as big of a rivalry as they say? My takeaway from yesterday is yes, but this wasn't the year to watch it. Lafayette needs to make some moves to improve the program, and give their fans something to cheer for again. That might take a year or two. For now though, Lehigh is taking their playoff bound squad to the post-season on a high note, winning the game they really had to win this season.
Labels:
Fisher Field,
The Lehigh-Lafayette Game
Location:
Easton, PA, USA
Re-Thinking My Relationship With Washington, DC
The night was May 1st, 2011, and I had only sent my family on their way back to Easton, PA a few hours earlier. I was all moved into my new apartment in Arlington, VA, and I was on my Twitter when rumors broke- Osama Bin Laden was dead. That night, I celebrated outside the White House with thousands of other folks around my age. It seemed as though my time in Washington, DC was going to be great.
It ended up being awful. I hated it. I hated the people, I hated the Metro, I hated the sports teams, I hated the bars, I hated life. In hindsight, much of this was my fault, and not their's. I was younger, and frankly not mature enough to want to live in a place like DC. I was flat broke. I was far less interested in my career, or politics in general, and was more interested in having a good time. I was distracted by other people, places, and things in my life at the time. By the end, I actually wanted out bad enough that I was overjoyed on the day I left.
Fast forward to Thursday, when I arrived in Arlington, to my old neighborhood, around 4 pm. I found my way to Bob and Edith's Diner, one of my old favorites in the area. I had myself a late lunch, and walked around in my old neighborhood. Everything old felt new again. Then I went over to the Southwest Waterfront neighborhood, my other "old" neighborhood, and walked around that region as well. It was like a new place to me. I was truly happy to be back in Washington.
I had begun to re-think if I wanted to be in Washington again around the moment I accepted a position on the Clinton campaign. Quite obviously, I am not going to be joining the next President in Washington now. The thought of it though was quite a leap, five years after leaving the town as fast as I could. I guess I'm a bit on the surprised side.
I will be returning to Washington, DC at the start of December to attend some holiday parties, hang out with some people, and see what is happening next. I could see myself taking a job there again, and possibly returning. I'm not quite ready to say that I want to, but I am quite ready to say i'm open to it. Maybe the Potomac isn't so bad after all.
It ended up being awful. I hated it. I hated the people, I hated the Metro, I hated the sports teams, I hated the bars, I hated life. In hindsight, much of this was my fault, and not their's. I was younger, and frankly not mature enough to want to live in a place like DC. I was flat broke. I was far less interested in my career, or politics in general, and was more interested in having a good time. I was distracted by other people, places, and things in my life at the time. By the end, I actually wanted out bad enough that I was overjoyed on the day I left.
Fast forward to Thursday, when I arrived in Arlington, to my old neighborhood, around 4 pm. I found my way to Bob and Edith's Diner, one of my old favorites in the area. I had myself a late lunch, and walked around in my old neighborhood. Everything old felt new again. Then I went over to the Southwest Waterfront neighborhood, my other "old" neighborhood, and walked around that region as well. It was like a new place to me. I was truly happy to be back in Washington.
I had begun to re-think if I wanted to be in Washington again around the moment I accepted a position on the Clinton campaign. Quite obviously, I am not going to be joining the next President in Washington now. The thought of it though was quite a leap, five years after leaving the town as fast as I could. I guess I'm a bit on the surprised side.
I will be returning to Washington, DC at the start of December to attend some holiday parties, hang out with some people, and see what is happening next. I could see myself taking a job there again, and possibly returning. I'm not quite ready to say that I want to, but I am quite ready to say i'm open to it. Maybe the Potomac isn't so bad after all.
Thursday, November 17, 2016
When a Campaign is too Big to Fail
Big fundraising totals. Big concerts. Huge call numbers. Gigantic staff. Lots of ads. Multiple Presidents on the stump. Huge metrics.
One gigantic loss.
With about two weeks left in the election, I explained to our organizers that the basic organizing principle behind the Clinton campaign was large metrics. More shifts. More organizers. More calls. More door knocks. More volunteers. Quantity was the name of the game. Even if that came at the expense of quality.
Follow up suffered. Relationships suffered. Volunteers didn't feel the connection. I didn't hear it from one person, or two, or three. I heard it from multiple people, in multiple regions, in multiple states. And I don't blame the people on the ground. In fact, I don't know that I blame any individual.
Grassroots organizing is not a quantity thing. It's not a "more" thing. It's not a "productivity" industry, but that's what it's been turned into. A "management" culture has overtaken it. It encourages organizers to cast-off or ignore the local leadership, if they aren't contributing to bigger numbers all the time.
Some of the main skills of organizing are being forgotten in the interest of "more." Relationships matter. Quality matters. We need to remember that moving forward.
One gigantic loss.
With about two weeks left in the election, I explained to our organizers that the basic organizing principle behind the Clinton campaign was large metrics. More shifts. More organizers. More calls. More door knocks. More volunteers. Quantity was the name of the game. Even if that came at the expense of quality.
Follow up suffered. Relationships suffered. Volunteers didn't feel the connection. I didn't hear it from one person, or two, or three. I heard it from multiple people, in multiple regions, in multiple states. And I don't blame the people on the ground. In fact, I don't know that I blame any individual.
Grassroots organizing is not a quantity thing. It's not a "more" thing. It's not a "productivity" industry, but that's what it's been turned into. A "management" culture has overtaken it. It encourages organizers to cast-off or ignore the local leadership, if they aren't contributing to bigger numbers all the time.
Some of the main skills of organizing are being forgotten in the interest of "more." Relationships matter. Quality matters. We need to remember that moving forward.
Labels:
organizing,
The Democratic Party
Location:
Washington, DC, USA
Wednesday, November 16, 2016
How to Stand Up to Trump
Donald Trump will be the President of the United States on January 20th. That's not under dispute. He will also lose the popular vote. That's pretty much settled at this point. Donald Trump did say things that were pretty bigoted, from calling Mexicans "rapists and drug dealers," to calling for a Muslim ban, to his denigration of women. That's also not being disputed.
The only one of those three points that is actually going to matter on January 20th is the first one. The second point is but a foot note in history at this point, and the third point was hammered home with millions of dollars of ads- and he still won. The truth is that Trump won in no small part because the attacks on him didn't motivate anyone. It's not that they didn't work, people don't like Donald Trump who voted for him, but none of these attacks got people motivated to vote for Hillary Clinton, and so they didn't. The late movement in the polls was simply a matter of people deciding she was an unacceptable choice for President, and voting for the alternative. People believed every thing that was said about Trump. None of it mattered to their lives.
Now we can sit here and slam those people, and sometimes it's worth doing so. It does take an extremely privileged person to ignore that a candidate for President is a bigot. It does take a morally bankrupt person to accept a White Nationalist in the White House. That's all true. It's not productive to constantly beat people up though. Telling white folks they are to blame for the "Trail of Tears," slavery, and all the Neo-Nazis behind Trump doesn't move them to act, it moves them to shut down. It moves them to tune you out. Why would you vote for a movement that's calling you a racist? No one is motivated by being shamed. Frankly, the perceived (though false) dishonesty of Hillary Clinton appeared to have more of an effect on voters than Donald being mixed in with bigots.
Shouting louder won't change the behavior of people. Calling them racists louder won't make them buy into it. Telling the working class to be different is probably not going to change them from what they are. If that is the game plan moving forward, Trump's coalition will hold.
There are three steps to attack Trump. If we do all three of them, there's a chance we start to hurt him, politically.
The only one of those three points that is actually going to matter on January 20th is the first one. The second point is but a foot note in history at this point, and the third point was hammered home with millions of dollars of ads- and he still won. The truth is that Trump won in no small part because the attacks on him didn't motivate anyone. It's not that they didn't work, people don't like Donald Trump who voted for him, but none of these attacks got people motivated to vote for Hillary Clinton, and so they didn't. The late movement in the polls was simply a matter of people deciding she was an unacceptable choice for President, and voting for the alternative. People believed every thing that was said about Trump. None of it mattered to their lives.
Now we can sit here and slam those people, and sometimes it's worth doing so. It does take an extremely privileged person to ignore that a candidate for President is a bigot. It does take a morally bankrupt person to accept a White Nationalist in the White House. That's all true. It's not productive to constantly beat people up though. Telling white folks they are to blame for the "Trail of Tears," slavery, and all the Neo-Nazis behind Trump doesn't move them to act, it moves them to shut down. It moves them to tune you out. Why would you vote for a movement that's calling you a racist? No one is motivated by being shamed. Frankly, the perceived (though false) dishonesty of Hillary Clinton appeared to have more of an effect on voters than Donald being mixed in with bigots.
Shouting louder won't change the behavior of people. Calling them racists louder won't make them buy into it. Telling the working class to be different is probably not going to change them from what they are. If that is the game plan moving forward, Trump's coalition will hold.
There are three steps to attack Trump. If we do all three of them, there's a chance we start to hurt him, politically.
- Put forward an actual economic agenda. No, it's not just trade and the minimum wage. How would we re-write the tax code? How about get more working class people into apprenticeships and other good paying jobs that anyone who wants to work can do? Let's talk community college and trade schools, how about it? Talk retirement. Talk protecting the safety net. Talk home ownership. Yes, talk trade and minimum wage too, but not just those. Oh, and for the love of God, talk inclusive, not intersectional. I'm all for intersectional politics, but that's not what sells a message to the middle class. The middle class is where elections are still won.
- Attack Donald Trump's failures. Donald Trump is not going to deliver the successes that he says. When he inevitably only delivers the kinds of things that any standard Republican would deliver (tax cuts, de-regulation), nail him with it. Remind people constantly of the things he promised. Remind them that they aren't getting those things. Be relentless on it.
- Focus on the economic, not the cultural. This doesn't mean we abandon all cultural issues or that we abandon attacking his most egregious failures. This means pick your spots. Donald Trump is going to encourage a lot of hate speech, hate crimes, and online harassment hate. You can't just slap him with all of them, people stop paying attention. Every time he passes traditional Republican orthodoxy on cutting wages, taxes, and regulation, you crush him with it. You call him an establishment Republican. You hit him on the worst of the culture war offenses, and you fight him on the fights that need fighting- like a Supreme Court justice.
We can't just hit Donald Trump how we want and expect it to work. I know that's not what anyone wants to hear, just like we hated when our mom told us to eat our peas and carrots before ice cream. I've spent my life in a white, working class house hold. I don't want this guy around any longer than necessary either. If we want him gone, discipline will be a huge part of how we do it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









